On Nov. 14, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) commented on the nation’s low birthrate, claiming that young people would surely have children if only they married first, and that the low marriage rate among young people is the cause of the rapid aging of Taiwan’s society. The Taipei City Government therefore proposed to offer subsidies to couples willing to marry.
Ko’s comment stirred up a great deal of protest. As a sociology student, I would like to remind the mayor that his remarks not only decontextualized the population aging issue, but also oversimplified the low birthrate problem.
First, a look at systemic factors shows that the government often treats women’s responsibility for raising children as a public good and excludes it from the social welfare system. Take the national pension system as an example: It often emphasizes working outside the home over domestic labor and its social and economic contributions.
In other words, the social welfare system is by design restricted to individual work performance while taking for granted the domestic labor that sustains the generations at work. For those who give up their jobs to raise children, the system is unfair.
In past agricultural societies, families without children could face economic and care risks as family members aged. However, the national pension program has almost replaced the concept of parents raising children as insurance for their later years, because the program has largely reduced the economic risks for couples without children.
As people become increasingly aware of gender issues, many educated women appear to favor this situation, as they start to move away from the gender stereotypes of traditional societies that dictate that women should stay at home and raise children. Many women no longer look at producing offspring as an obligation and are instead seeking self-realization.
Influenced by these factors, it is clearly a beneficial alternative for a rational person to choose not to have children, and instead start working to pursue economic security.
Therefore, it is not difficult to understand why many young people choose not to marry or to marry without having children, and the reason for this is the imbalance of the burden between families with kids and families without kids.
The real solution to the aging society problem is for the government to take the initiative to reconstruct the relationship-based childcare system and make it a collective responsibility and obligation.
The authorities should also institutionalize childcare and make it a public service, thus overturning the childcare imbalances between the sexes to reverse the low birthrate and address the population aging issue from the root.
While Ko attempts to solve the low birthrate issue by encouraging young people to marry, he clearly does not touch on the core of the problem and arrogantly overlooks the environmental factors that are integral to this social issue.
As a potential candidate in the 2024 presidential election, if Ko does not even have the most basic understanding of the issue, he should know his place and quit politics when his current term ends to avoid bringing disaster to the nation and its people.
Su Chun-yu is a student in National Sun Yat-sen University’s Department of Sociology.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In a statement that came as a shock to many, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Saturday announced the immediate annulment of all “self-imposed” guidelines on US executive relations with Taiwan, which he said Washington took “unilaterally, in an attempt to appease the Communist regime in Beijing.” It could be the most sweeping advancement in Taiwan-US ties in decades. No longer would officials need to meet in “private meeting rooms or restaurants,” or avoid references to a Taiwanese country or government. High-level personnel could attend official events, including Double Ten National Day celebrations. Coverage of the decision has been predictably alarmist,
Lately I have been mulling over the checkered career of Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), former Mayor of Taipei and President of Taiwan, who subsequently spent 6+ years in jail after being convicted of corruption. I was a witness to some of this, and have studied President Chen’s career over the years. While recognizing that I am treading on sensitive political ground, I will attempt here to parse out the key phases, in an attempt to make sense of this controversial political figure’s career. I first met Chen (CSB, as many of us colloquially referred to him) in 1998, when he was Mayor
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s announcement on Saturday that the US was to drop self-imposed restrictions on meetings between senior Taiwanese and US officials had immediate real-world effects. On Monday, US Ambassador to the Netherlands Pete Hoekstra met Representative to the Netherlands Chen Hsing-hsing (陳欣新) at the US embassy in The Hague, with both noting on social media the historic nature of this seemingly modest event. Modest perhaps, but their meeting would have been impossible before Pompeo’s announcement. Some have welcomed this move, thinking that it is long-overdue and a step in the right direction to normalizing relations between
The US’ relationships with its core democratic partners are set to rebound dramatically after US president-elect Joe Biden takes office. Allies in Europe and Asia relish the prospect of a US president committed to adhering to democratic traditions at home, honor strategic commitments abroad, and be a team player. Solidarity among the world’s democracies is especially important when it comes to standing up to China. The EU’s decision last week to sign an investment accord with that country underscores the potential for serious discord. Even though the Biden camp cautioned the EU against moving ahead with the agreement, it nonetheless sealed the