The US’ relationships with its core democratic partners are set to rebound dramatically after US president-elect Joe Biden takes office. Allies in Europe and Asia relish the prospect of a US president committed to adhering to democratic traditions at home, honor strategic commitments abroad, and be a team player.
Solidarity among the world’s democracies is especially important when it comes to standing up to China. The EU’s decision last week to sign an investment accord with that country underscores the potential for serious discord.
Even though the Biden camp cautioned the EU against moving ahead with the agreement, it nonetheless sealed the deal (pending ratification).
To be sure, China’s headstrong ways motivate the world’s democracies to band together against it. Yet its growing geopolitical heft and the allure of Chinese trade and investment also tempt many countries, democracies included, to curry favor with its government.
Accordingly, Biden should launch early in his presidency a concerted effort to forge a united democratic front on China, guided by the following three principles.
First, the US should dial down the rhetoric and treat China as a formidable competitor, not an implacable foe. A US strategy of rigid containment or aggressive rollback would find few adherents in either Europe or Asia, implying that it would backfire strategically.
Democrats and Republicans might be seeking to outdo each other when it comes to calls for getting tough with China, but if foreign partners see Biden as spoiling for a fight, the US will do more to divide than unite the world’s major democracies.
China already has significant geopolitical and economic clout in Asia and beyond — especially through the Belt and Road Initiative, its massive investment program in global infrastructure and commercial development. The genie cannot be put back in the bottle.
Pragmatic realism, not bombast, should guide US strategy toward China. Of course, the US should make clear its red lines, especially when it comes to Taiwan’s autonomy and freedom of navigation in the Asia-Pacific.
However, the US and China should aim for shared leadership in the region — a strategic objective that would enjoy ample support among US allies already fearful of the escalating Sino-US rivalry.
Second, the US and its key allies need to link arms to confront China on trade and investment. Economic decoupling is not in the offing; China is far too integrated into the global economy. Nonetheless, import competition from China and its unfair trade practices have cost the developed democracies millions of jobs over the past two decades. Pressing China to level the playing field could work to their economic advantage.
The US and its allies need to team up to maximize effectiveness. Acting unilaterally, as US President Donald Trump did — and as the EU is doing — only plays to China’s strength by diluting the collective bargaining power of the world’s democracies. Trump’s tariffs have done little to liberalize China’s market or bring down the US trade deficit.
Instead, global pressure would be required to push back against China’s harmful trade practices, including state subsidies and intellectual property theft. Although full-scale decoupling is not in the cards, the US should join with its democratic allies to pull back from China when it comes to sensitive technologies, such as semiconductors and artificial intelligence.
The same holds for imposing new export controls, scrutinizing and regulating Chinese investment abroad, steering clear of Huawei Technologies when it comes to building 5G networks, and repatriating high-end production.
These steps would align well with the domestic measures that the Biden administration and the governments of many other democracies are poised to take to generate more jobs and better pay for blue-collar workers. The goal must be to ensure that economic growth and gains from trade are more inclusive.
Spending on infrastructure, education and retraining, research and development, and renewable energy can help the major democracies maintain their competitive edge over China.
Finally, the US and its democratic partners should speak with a single voice when it comes to standing up for human rights. Resolute condemnation of China’s unwillingness to grant basic freedoms to its citizens would put China’s leadership on the defensive in the court of international opinion. It would help repair the erosion of the US’ moral authority under Trump.
Democratic leaders can further raise the costs to China’s rulers by imposing sanctions on those responsible for oppressing Uighurs in Xinjiang and cracking down on Hong Kong. When China resorts to economic coercion to punish countries for criticizing its human rights record, as it is doing with Australia, the world’s democracies should respond in kind.
Working to build a consensus around these three principles would not only signal the depth of the Biden administration’s commitment to work with its partners, but it would also play to the US’ strongest suit when it comes to handling China: its alliances.
China has only one ally — North Korea — while the US has loyal partners worldwide. China’s economy is set to be the world’s largest by the end of the decade, but its GDP would remain roughly one-third the collective size of the world’s major democracies.
As long as they stand together and aggregate their geopolitical and economic heft, the main democracies would outclass China for the foreseeable future.
Biden would need to summon all of his persuasive skills to forge a coordinated approach toward China. His task is made easier because even as they eye the benefits of more commerce with China, democracies in Europe and Asia are anxious about China’s intentions. They would welcome a US president who respects allies and appreciates the need for teamwork to deal with China.
Charles Kupchan, a member of the US National Security Council under former US presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, is a professor of international affairs at Georgetown University and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Peter Trubowitz is a professor of international relations and director of the US Centre at the London School of Economics.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
When Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) wakes up one morning and decides that his People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can win a war to conquer Taiwan, that is when his war will begin. To ensure that Xi never gains that confidence it is now necessary for the United States to shed any notions of “forbearance” in arms sales to Taiwan. Largely because they could guarantee military superiority on the Taiwan Strait, US administrations from Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama practiced “forbearance” — pre-emptive limitation of arms sales to Taiwan — in hopes of gaining diplomatic leverage with Beijing. President Ronald
Communist China’s Global Times warned US President Joe Biden in the first week of this month that he “should make a significant response to China’s sincerity within his first 100 days, as the sincerity and patience will not last forever.” In fact, they lasted only days. By the end of the week, Beijing had laid down the law, so to speak, to the Biden administration. First was a speech billed as a “Dialogue with National Committee on US-China Relations,” by Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪), director of China’s Office of the Central Commission for Foreign Affairs. Yang said he was pleased “to have
Three years ago, former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) raised quite a few eyebrows when she proposed abolishing Taiwan’s zhuyin fuhao (注音符號, Mandarin phonetic symbols commonly known as “Bopomofo”) system in her bid to become Tainan mayor. Yeh did not make it onto the ballot, and it was not clear how she would have begun to implement such a gargantuan change locally. Not only is Bopomofo learned by all schoolchildren in Taiwan, it is the most popular system for typing Chinese in the nation, despite being considered one of the least efficient input methods. Bopomofo has also become
The Canadian parliament on Monday passed a motion saying that China’s human rights abuses against the country’s Uighur Muslim population in Xinjiang constitute “genocide.” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has so far avoided using the word genocide in regard to Xinjiang, but if he did, it would begin to generate solidarity among G7 nations on the issue — which is something Trudeau has called for. Former US president Donald Trump used the word genocide regarding Xinjiang before leaving office last month, and members of US President Joe Biden’s administration have been pushing for him to make the same declaration, a Reuters report