Hundreds of luxury apartments overlooking Tokyo Bay that were due to be converted from the Athletes’ Village have already been sold — just one of the many headaches caused by the historic postponement of the Tokyo Olympics.
Touted by developers as a “flagship neighbourhood for urban lifestyles”, the buildings housing the 11,000 competitors were to be hastily repurposed into more than 4,000 condos with stunning city views, some carrying a price tag of 170 million yen (US$1.5 million).
The decision to postpone the Games by up to a year has pitched buyers into uncertainty, according to Zoe Ward, director of Tokyo Property Central, with close to 900 units already snapped up.
“Even if it’s not a financial hit, it’s going to be a big inconvenience to them,” Ward said.
She added that buyers would now be scouring the small print of their contracts to see if they can pull out without losing their deposits — usually around five percent.
“The wording they put in the contract is pretty vague, it normally says natural disasters or anything outside the sellers’ control so it might fall under that category,” said the property expert.
One buyer, a man in his 30s, had been planning to move into the development in March 2023 with his wife and children and said there were “many, many scenarios” that could now arise.
However, he was relatively zen about the delay given the unprecedented coronavirus situation.
“I’m not so stupid as to see the coronavirus effect as being a problem on the same level as a construction defect. I would say it can’t be helped. I’m sure the selling side is facing a hard time,” said the man, who declined to be named.
Tomohiro Makino, CEO of consulting firm Oraga Research and an expert on Japanese real estate, said that developers faced a “double whammy” of a falling market generally and image problems with the Olympic Village project.
“There is a concern prices could drop. If excitement and anticipation (about the Olympics) fades away, the situation will be severe for the selling side. For now, cancellations are a critical problem for them,” said Makino.
One of the biggest draws — being part of the Olympic legacy — could now be tarnished, he added.
He said developers should have legal cover from a force majeure clause but given the high profile of the project, they may be inclined to show flexibility — especially as only a quarter of the units have been put up for sale.
“The selling side has been forced into making a tough decision,” he said.
Sellers had marketed the development, which comprises 23 tower blocks capable of housing up to 12,000 people, as “the city complex where everything begins” with views of the ocean, Tokyo Tower and the metropolis’ glittering skyline.
The 18-hectare (45 acre) plot would also feature schools, a playground, swimming pool and gym. As the apartments are renovated from elite athletes’ accommodation, they are also slightly bigger than average Tokyo flats, which tend to be on the small side.
“Looking from the sky, the new neighbourhood appears like a large flag right in the middle of Tokyo. It has limitless potential as a new flagship model for urban lifestyles,” according to the promotional material.
The development is a joint-venture bringing together 11 of Japan’s top real estate firms.
A spokeswoman for one of the firms, Mitsui Fudosan Co, said: “We are hurriedly assessing the impact of the postponement of the Olympics with companies and officials involved in the project.”
The sale of the second batch of units has been delayed from March to June or later, said another official at the company, insisting this was “due to the effect of the new coronavirus. It’s nothing to do with a possible postponement of the Olympics.”
Ward said that while uncertainty hung over both buyers and developers, the situation was better than the limbo they faced before the International Olympic Committee and Japan’s unprecedented decision.
“Once the government gets a clear schedule (for the Games to go ahead), then the project will start doing active sales again. Up until (the night before the decision), I think it was worse for buyers because no one knew what they were doing,” she said.
“I feel like it’s good news because a cancellation would be far worse for everyone’s attitude and general feeling. I think an extension is the best thing we could have. Going through with it would be terrible and cancelling it would be worse.”
It has been 26 years since Nicholas Gould hosted his last Issues and Opinions radio show for ICRT a recording studio on Roosevelt Road. He remembers the familiar ‘whoosh’ as the door to the soundproof room closes and recognizes the carpet, but the recording equipment is gone, with half of the space being used for storage. Gould is filled with nostalgia as he greets his guests, two financial writers who are here to discuss Taiwan’s post-COVID-19 economy for his new podcast, Taiwan Matters. Gould had been thinking of revisiting his old career for a while, but being allowed access to
The 22nd Taipei Arts Festival (臺北藝術節) opens tonight with three productions, a slightly scaled-down pandemic version that seeks to keep its tradition of big ideas, challenging programs and international connections alive and moving forward in an increasingly uncertain world. The theme of this year’s festival is “Super@#S%?” — as good a term as any when descriptives and superlatives seem not only inadequate, but somewhat irrelevant in a world where so many people cannot imagine being able to return to theaters, either as performers or audience members — they are too worried about having a job and their health. Technically, however, it is
Shuanglianpi (雙連埤) is both a Hakka outpost and a place of great ecological interest. The conjoined body of water from which it gets its name is the centerpiece of the 17.16-hectare Shuanglianpi Wildlife Refuge (雙連埤野生動物保護區). No waterways of significance fill or drain this scenic lake in Yilan County’s Yuanshan Township (員山鄉). During the 1895 to 1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial authorities — struggling to secure Taiwan’s foothills — encouraged Han people to settle in areas adjacent to indigenous communities. Around 1910, a 49-year-old Hakka pioneer called Tsou Cheng-sheng (鄒成生) from what’s now Taoyuan decided to begin farming at
Wild Sparrow (野雀之詩) is simple and extremely slow paced, told through the eyes of Han (Kao Yu-hsia, 高於夏), an introspective, shy grade schooler who lives with his great-grandmother in the verdant countryside. Han has a fascination with sparrows, which are either flying high in the sky or trapped in cages and nets, providing a constant metaphor throughout the film. In the most ironic scene, a man catches the birds just to charge people to set them free again, taking advantage of Buddhists who engage in the ritual of “releasing” animals from captivity. Han takes a badly injured sparrow home and